UNDERSTANDING THE NATURE OF THE ETHNIC CONFLICT IN NORTHERN SOMALIA, SOMALILAND’ : AN EXPERT REPORT
Social conflict and political violence in Northern Somalia “Somaliland” is a complex subject, and it will be useful to note a few trends in its recent history. Many political commentators suggest that underlying ethnic cleavages are the source of domestic instability. Political parties are organized on clan, tribal, or ethnic lines, when politicians and future leaders often play upon ethnic differences to rise to power.
Citing the trend, one could possibly envision on how the people was and will always be susceptible to civil unrest, mistrust and group repression. In their long history, various clans never agreed on the balance of power and a middle ground solution was needed when such contentious issues were brought to the negotiating table. In compromise, neither side could get all of what it asked for but each side had to make difficult concessions. Serious attempts from sincere politicians was always missing.
Before the arrival of Britain, the people and lands which became Somaliland Protectorate in the late 19th century were traditionally divided into clans and their territories. Each clan was separate and independent from the other. Chiefs, Suldans, Grads and Ugases administered the civil and judicial matters inside and outside clans. Some clans, like the Dhulbahante, did not sign any formal treaty with the British
During the British protectorate rule, each clan maintained its internal administration and the United Kingdom recognized each clan area as a separately protected people and territory. That was because, the clan treaties defined land boundaries and people. This means that neither the British nor the clans were interested in the creation of a unitary state of Somalis in the North. At any point in their long history, the northerners never agreed to form a unitary state. The declaration of independence automatically annulled the ” Somaliland British mandate” leaving the clans and their chieftains in their different territorial jurisdictions.
The initial political conflict began when in 1959, the British administration, in their last days of departure, unfairly distributed first legislative council of 33 seats of which 21 were given to one group. The other four clans saw that as domination of one tribe. Borama travelled to the eastern Darood groups asking for alliance and on 17/10/159, the United Somali Party ( USP). This party with the majority of Northerners who wanted greater Somalia was the ideological base for the Northern Unification with the South.
Few Northern leaders, particularly from Isaq, did not meet their expectations on how the cabinet and other government positions were divided. Shortly, after unification, in 1961, these groups attempted a coup in the north but was immediately aborted. In the Northern Somalia, the trend of secession revived in 1980 when the public, in general, resented their government and different clans announced the formation of their own movements…USC for Hawiye, SPM for Ogaden, SDA for Samaroon, SNM for Isaq, SSDF for Majeerteen …and many more.
-1977-78 Somali/Ethiopian war displaced more than a million Somalis. Most of them were in refugee camps in Northern Somalia. The refugee camps were run by UNHCR budget and were located in Hargeisa Dam, Adhicadays, Lasdhuure, Agabar, Arabsiyo, Tugwajale, Daraymaane and Darbihorre.
-The influx of large refugees had a significant impact on the people as the newcomers appeared to be having more opportunities than the natives of the region. They smoothly mixed in the ruling system, had equal, sometimes more equal, than others in every field of life as in government jobs, in business and even in land ownership.
-In 1980, a team of young elite suspected that the refugees were systematically integrating into the country with the government backing. The group founded a cover up charity organization, U.F.O, with a political agenda. The aim was to raise the public awareness about the threat of the large refugee population and the government’s financial and power facilitation.
– After 1977-78 war, Mogadishu funded four rebel groups against Ethiopian regime. These fighters were formed on tribal basis and were the Horyal for the Samaron, Afraad for the Isaaq and WSLF for Ogaden and for Sh. Belisa of Bali. The government, after misunderstandings, suspended funding the Afraad rebel wing who immediately moved to Ethiopian and surrendered themselves to Mengistu, the Ethiopian leader. They were given a base in Duryo when UFO team in Hargeisa also became partners in principle. Shortly, after that, SNM was founded in London on April 6, 1981.
– From that time and afterwards, a new era escaping to Ethiopia has started. Security officials, politicians and many important personalities from Isaaq tribes left the country to Ethiopia to join the SNM. In 1983, those in Ethiopia, the London and other delegates met in Adari, Ethiopia and chose their first joint council headed by Sh. Yusuf sh. Ali Madar. in August 1984, Ahmed Mohamed Siilaanyo was elected as leader.
-On March 19, 1988, Mengistu of Ethiopia decided to mend relations with Siyad Barre. Mengistu’s plan was to secure the Ethiopian/ Somali front in order to send troops to Eritrea. This was a turning point in the SNM history because they were ordered to stop attacks and move their militias 15km inland away from the Somali border.
– At that point, Siilaanyo, had to make a critical choice and chose wrong road. He asked his team to go inside where confrontation with the government has started. The SNM launched a military campaign in 1988, temporarily capturing Burao on May 27 and part of Hargeysa on May 31. Government forces fought the opposition militia in the streets, forcing the SNM to withdraw and causing more than 300,000 to flee to Ethiopia. The military regime conducted the same reprisals against the Majeerteen rebels, destruction of water wells, grazing grounds and wiping out whole villages.
In this case, the government had a responsibility to fight the invaders who decided to fight inside the public and behind the cover of the civilians. The fighting in the towns was, of course, unwise and one should expect high casualty. In that fight, it was impossible to say who killed who as SNM, itself, in full scale, engaged in killing the military as well as fleeing non-Isaaq people.
Aftermath the war, large number of dead bodies were left in many different parts of towns. An eye witness woman tells me that they were too busy in making ropes from their clothes. Since there was no enough people to do the burying, the few volunteers tied the bodies together and put them in shallow graves, enough to hide them. Whether that type of war can satisfy the genocide legal definition will be discussed in the next section of this paper.
– Siilanyo’s wrong move displaced the Isaag populations who were camped in Ethiopian refugee camps. Again, it is apparent that SNM was responsible for the displacement of hundreds of thousands of refugees to Ethiopia. The refugees sheltered SNM when waging their attacks, from there, to inland Somalia. Later in the years, the Addis/Mogadishu peace agreement did not sustain and SNM was getting a lot of support from Mengistu of Ethiopia.
– In 1989, SNM ranks was in trouble when Siilaanyo targeted Habar Awal leaders of whom many disappeared. He also started a dialogue of negotiations with Siyad Barre regime through a close friend and relative Adan Mohamed Ahmed Qaybe, the last Somalia’s Foreign Minister. In April 1990, the division resulted Siilaanyo’s downfall and the appointment of Abdirahman Ahmed Ali (Abdirahman Tuur) as leader.
– For a decade,1981 to 1991, SNM was unable to enter the North, but were given the victory by the Aideed USC who removed Siyad Barre from Mogadishu on January 19,1991. At that time, SNM, without resistance, rushed the gates of Northern Somalia.
-Having access to large number of abandoned weapons, SNM, backed by Ethiopian troops, attacked the civilian populations of Awdal. They levelled the historic town of Dilla, killing more than 700 of its people. They then passed to the regional capital city of Borama where they killed 746 in less than 16 hours. Warehouses and homes were emptied, and they left death and destruction, without the least moral value, enjoying their convoys of looted property. Ironically, SNM who claim unjustifiable genocide were responsible for genocide in Awdal region.
There is no question about the repressive and irresponsible nature of the Siyad regime but that cannot justify the equally reckless, merciless and the mindless behaviour of the SNM towards its neighbours.
– Within a short time, SNM’s internal power struggle began. Abandoned military bases were taken by clan rivals where Arab tribe had the largest one and even the airport was taken by Edagale. As part of jurisdiction and land claims, the roads became impassable because of young men who controlled them with road blocks. In the middle of lawlessness, SNM, without approval from other people in the country, declared secession from the rest of the country. The two year transitional mandate given to SNM to stabilize the country did not work.
– In early 1993, Looking for a way out of the lawlessness, Habar Awal neighbour tribe members approached Samaroon elders and asked for help. At that point, Samaroon decided to forget the past, mend relations and organised that historic conference in Borama. For five months, Samaroon mind and material logistics was founded with the present Somaliland to move forward and to function as an administration.
GENOCIDE– THE LAW OF THE CASE
The term ‘Genocide’ was coined by Polish writer and attorney, Raphael Lemkin, in 1941 by combining the Greek word ‘genos’ (race) with the Latin word ‘cide’ (killing). Genocide as defined by the United Nations in 1948 means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, including: (a) killing members of the group.
The international legal definition of genocide, here, refers to the deliberate and systematic destruction of a group and the intent to destroy. In the SNM and Somali military confrontation, what happened does not meet the code of genocide in UN’s 1948 convention for many reasons:
1. From the part of the government forces, there was no intent to destroy in whole or in part. The security forces were doing their job to fight SNM militia whose aim was to destabilize the country. They attempted to protect the country to fall into anarchy in which every Somali suffered after the loss of their state, peace and dignity.
2. SNM started the war and they were well aware of the consequences. Therefore, the results of the anticipated outcome of their actions is their fault.
3. SNM, as part of their war strategy, planed to displace the population in the cities to Ethiopia in order to get more people for the fight and also to have shelter within the refugees. This was completely different from the 1915 Ottoman Empire/Armenian genocide case in which deportation was forced–escorted marches of hundreds of thousands of people under conditions designed to lead to death.
Determining the facts and the historical events constitute a genocide are not always as the claimants wish to be. Many of the world’s genocide claim cases were classified merely as criminal or inhuman behaviour and most of the cases are still unsolved. The investigation, the jurisdictional authority, the responsible world bodies and the judicial process is complex and exhausting.
In nearly every case where accusations of genocide have circulated, partisans of various sides have fiercely disputed the interpretation and details of the event, often to the point of promoting wildly different versions of the facts. A report of genocide may seem easy for some people but that will always be controversial and a long way. In the last half a century ( 1951-2000), there was 20 international cases of which most of them could not pass the first tests.
In Northern Somalia’s “Somaliland’ recent talks of genocide, the question is related to the leaders and why they failed spectacularly to see past their own personal gain for the collective good of their people. For a quarter of a century, they enriched themselves by renting the country to foreign countries and to business partners. Young people die in the seas in their attempts to immigrate for jobs and better life. Today’s digging of mysterious “mass-graves” is a new strategy for the loss of another quarter of a century. The purpose is to cover up the reality on the ground…the corruption, the tribalism and the repression of the stateless people in that part of the country.
Osman Elmi firstname.lastname@example.org
Feb 26, 2015 0Twin schoolgirls who followed their jihadi brother from Manchester to Syria...
Feb 26, 2015 1
Feb 26, 2015 0
Feb 26, 2015 0
Feb 25, 2015 0